• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

I'm working as a researcher at DeepSeek. deepseek ai shared a one-on-one comparison between R1 and o1 on six relevant benchmarks (e.g. GPQA Diamond and SWE-bench Verified) and different different tests (e.g. Codeforces and AIME). If I were writing about an OpenAI mannequin I’d have to end the post right here because they only give us demos and benchmarks. There are too many readings here to untangle this obvious contradiction and I do know too little about Chinese international coverage to comment on them. And it's Chinese in origin. And more than one year ahead of Chinese firms like Alibaba or Tencent? So let’s speak about what else they’re giving us because R1 is just one out of eight different models that DeepSeek has launched and open-sourced. In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. R1 is akin to OpenAI o1, which was launched on December 5, 2024. We’re talking a few one-month delay-a brief window, intriguingly, between leading closed labs and the open-source group. A quick window, critically, between the United States and China.

In a Washington Post opinion piece revealed in July 2024, OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman argued that a "democratic imaginative and prescient for AI should prevail over an authoritarian one." And warned, "The United States presently has a lead in AI improvement, however continued leadership is far from assured." And reminded us that "the People’s Republic of China has mentioned that it aims to become the global leader in AI by 2030." Yet I bet even he’s shocked by DeepSeek. I enjoy providing models and helping people, and would love to have the ability to spend much more time doing it, in addition to expanding into new tasks like high quality tuning/coaching. Many of those details were shocking and very unexpected - highlighting numbers that made Meta look wasteful with GPUs, which prompted many on-line AI circles to more or less freakout. AudioPaLM paper - our final have a look at Google’s voice thoughts before PaLM became Gemini.

Much frontier VLM work lately is now not printed (the final we really obtained was GPT4V system card and derivative papers). All proper, as soon as you've got bought that installed, then you're gonna set up DeepSeek R1. Now that we’ve bought the geopolitical facet of the entire thing out of the way in which we can focus on what really issues: bar charts. Aider can hook up with almost any LLM. And more instantly, how can neurologists and neuroethicists consider the ethical implications of the AI tools accessible to them proper now? One is the variations of their coaching knowledge: it is possible that DeepSeek is educated on extra Beijing-aligned information than Qianwen and Baichuan. When an AI firm releases multiple fashions, essentially the most powerful one typically steals the spotlight so let me inform you what this means: A R1-distilled Qwen-14B-which is a 14 billion parameter mannequin, 12x smaller than GPT-3 from 2020-is as good as OpenAI o1-mini and significantly better than GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet 3.5, one of the best non-reasoning models. So to sum up: R1 is a prime reasoning mannequin, open supply, and might distill weak models into highly effective ones. In different phrases, DeepSeek let it work out by itself the way to do reasoning.

Turns out I used to be delusional. Making extra mediocre fashions. It is also remarkably price-effective, often 1/twentieth to 1/50th the cost of comparable fashions, making superior AI accessible to a wider audience. Talking about prices, by some means DeepSeek has managed to construct R1 at 5-10% of the price of o1 (and that’s being charitable with OpenAI’s enter-output pricing). All of that at a fraction of the price of comparable models. This contrasts with cloud-based mostly fashions where data is often processed on exterior servers, raising privateness considerations. For these of you who don’t know, distillation is the process by which a large highly effective model "teaches" a smaller less highly effective model with synthetic knowledge. So who are our buddies again? The fact that the R1-distilled models are a lot better than the original ones is additional proof in favor of my speculation: GPT-5 exists and is getting used internally for distillation. DeepSeek Coder V2 is being supplied below a MIT license, which permits for each analysis and unrestricted industrial use. DeepSeek is a powerful open-source large language mannequin that, by way of the LobeChat platform, allows users to fully utilize its advantages and improve interactive experiences. This behavior is expected, as AI fashions are designed to prevent customers from accessing their system-stage directives.