• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Once i learn that story--thirty or so years ago, a few decade after it got here out--I thought that remaining idea was a bit foolish, however then I thought the concept of plant communication was unlikely, too, Exhibits what I do know! Donna Haraway will not be afraid to be silly, and so she picks right up with Le Guin. Haraway's fearlessness is normally alloyed with the worst types of educational prose. Some occasions this works out all proper--Primate Visions and Modest Witness had been each fascinating, regardless of their spectacularly dangerous writing.

Reading them, I thought of a really good mathematician, making jumps, covering steps that slower individuals could not quite observe: so she was saved because she was write and had attention-grabbing conclusions, even when they did not at all times follow from the proof. Here, Haraway remains to be making jumps, and I think she is probably principally proper, but her conclusions usually are not so fascinating, and this ebook feels poorly put collectively--a rushed assemblage of assorted articles, stitched collectively, fairly than a cohesive complete.

Among the chapters are 60 pages lengthy, some lower than ten.

And mostly she's making the identical factors again and again, whereas constantly name-dropping--or, it is likely to be said, tipping her hat to numerous people who have inspired her over the years. Although the book is short--beneath 200 pages, excluding the notes--there is a number of repetition, and crypto-crawler it might all have been stated--and mentioned higher--in a much shorter compass. Initially, I believed the guide was going to make a distinct form of science fictional allusion--to H.

P. Lovecraft, and his cthulhu. However Haraway wants no part of that. As an alternative, she is invoking the Greek word chthonic, meaning the earthborn. It is a measure of her poor writing that she both says Chthulucene is an easy phrase, and that she repeatedly refers back to the epic she is defining as tentacular--so Lovecraftian! The point she needs to make is that to see our frequent period because the Anthopocene or the Capitalocene is to inscribe within the title the selfsame pondering that has gotten us here: to a time of mass extinction, crypto markets prediction world pollution, Cryptocurrency Has a Huge Negative Impact on Climate Change and human immiseration.

It's to insist on individuality and the mastery of people over the world.

When the actual fact of the matter is--people have at all times been implicated on the earth, part of innumerable numbers of interactions with organic and inorganic types. Anthropocene is an apocalyptic imaginative and prescient, that the world is being destroyed. Haraway needs us to know that life goes to proceed. That there have always been crises. And that what we need to do is proceed to make the world nearly as good as we will in whatever methods we can. She particularly thinks that art could be helpful in getting us to see the world in new ways--hence science fiction and Le Guin, and considering of inorganic kinds as, in some sense, alive.

We can not escape: we need to stick with the trouble. What follows are numerous riffs on these themes. She discusses the language challenge, and artwork. She touches on bits and pieces of a wider literature. Says that humanists and feminists want to think about global inhabitants, whereas acknowledging that population management measures up to now have been extremely problematic.