• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

The AI race is heating up, and DeepSeek AI is positioning itself as a drive to be reckoned with. When small Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) company Deepseek Online chat released a family of extremely environment friendly and highly aggressive AI models last month, it rocked the global tech community. It achieves a powerful 91.6 F1 rating in the 3-shot setting on DROP, outperforming all other fashions in this class. On math benchmarks, DeepSeek-V3 demonstrates exceptional efficiency, significantly surpassing baselines and setting a new state-of-the-art for non-o1-like fashions. DeepSeek-V3 demonstrates aggressive performance, standing on par with prime-tier fashions similar to LLaMA-3.1-405B, GPT-4o, and Claude-Sonnet 3.5, whereas significantly outperforming Qwen2.5 72B. Moreover, DeepSeek-V3 excels in MMLU-Pro, a more difficult academic data benchmark, where it carefully trails Claude-Sonnet 3.5. On MMLU-Redux, a refined model of MMLU with corrected labels, DeepSeek-V3 surpasses its peers. This success can be attributed to its superior data distillation method, which effectively enhances its code era and downside-solving capabilities in algorithm-focused tasks.

On the factual information benchmark, SimpleQA, DeepSeek-V3 falls behind GPT-4o and Claude-Sonnet, primarily on account of its design focus and resource allocation. Fortunately, early indications are that the Trump administration is contemplating further curbs on exports of Nvidia chips to China, in accordance with a Bloomberg report, with a deal with a potential ban on the H20s chips, a scaled down model for the China market. We use CoT and non-CoT methods to evaluate mannequin efficiency on LiveCodeBench, the place the data are collected from August 2024 to November 2024. The Codeforces dataset is measured using the percentage of competitors. On top of them, retaining the training information and the other architectures the same, we append a 1-depth MTP module onto them and train two models with the MTP strategy for comparison. Because of our environment friendly architectures and comprehensive engineering optimizations, DeepSeek-V3 achieves extraordinarily excessive training effectivity. Furthermore, tensor parallelism and skilled parallelism strategies are included to maximize effectivity.

DeepSeek V3 and R1 are massive language models that provide excessive efficiency at low pricing. Measuring huge multitask language understanding. DeepSeek differs from different language models in that it's a set of open-supply massive language models that excel at language comprehension and versatile application. From a more detailed perspective, we evaluate DeepSeek-V3-Base with the opposite open-supply base fashions individually. Overall, DeepSeek-V3-Base comprehensively outperforms DeepSeek-V2-Base and Qwen2.5 72B Base, and surpasses LLaMA-3.1 405B Base in the vast majority of benchmarks, basically changing into the strongest open-source model. In Table 3, we compare the base model of DeepSeek-V3 with the state-of-the-art open-source base fashions, together with DeepSeek-V2-Base (DeepSeek-AI, 2024c) (our earlier release), Qwen2.5 72B Base (Qwen, 2024b), and LLaMA-3.1 405B Base (AI@Meta, 2024b). We consider all these models with our inside analysis framework, and ensure that they share the same evaluation setting. DeepSeek-V3 assigns extra training tokens to be taught Chinese information, resulting in distinctive performance on the C-SimpleQA.

From the table, we can observe that the auxiliary-loss-free strategy persistently achieves higher model performance on most of the evaluation benchmarks. As well as, on GPQA-Diamond, a PhD-level evaluation testbed, DeepSeek-V3 achieves remarkable results, ranking simply behind Claude 3.5 Sonnet and outperforming all other competitors by a considerable margin. As DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V3 additionally employs additional RMSNorm layers after the compressed latent vectors, and multiplies extra scaling elements at the width bottlenecks. For mathematical assessments, AIME and CNMO 2024 are evaluated with a temperature of 0.7, and the outcomes are averaged over 16 runs, whereas MATH-500 employs greedy decoding. This vulnerability was highlighted in a current Cisco study, which discovered that DeepSeek failed to block a single dangerous prompt in its safety assessments, including prompts related to cybercrime and misinformation. For reasoning-associated datasets, together with those targeted on mathematics, code competition problems, and logic puzzles, we generate the information by leveraging an internal DeepSeek-R1 model.

If you beloved this posting and you would like to acquire more data concerning free Deep seek kindly check out the website.